Alex, since you seem to know everything, here's a question for you:
What gave you the right to interfere in Matt Pacini's ebay auction?
Answer the question.
<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Cowardness in the face of accepting responsibility for his actions: Typical for Alex.Originally posted by Alex:
Typical for Roger.
Answer the question. It's been asked, like, over a dozen times.
Alex, since you seem to know everything, here's a question for you:
What gave you the right to interfere in Matt Pacini's ebay auction?
Answer the question.
<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Cowardness in the face of accepting responsibility for his actions: Typical for Alex.Originally posted by MovieStuff:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="verdana, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Originally posted by Alex:
Typical for Roger.
Answer the question. It's been asked, like, over a dozen times.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">It's been answered SEVERAL times. Your Ken Starr behavior won't work here bud.
<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Nobody's dumb enough to buy it.Originally posted by Alex:
It's been answered SEVERAL times.
<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">No it hasn't. Quit lying.Originally posted by Alex:
It's been answered SEVERAL times.
Explain why you felt you had the right to interfere in Matt Pacini's auction.
Answer the question.
<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Nobody's dumb enough to buy it.</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Are you refering to Matt's camera?Originally posted by cameraguy:
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="verdana, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">Originally posted by Alex:
It's been answered SEVERAL times.
Obviously I would have contacted Matt if it was an realistic option,
iust like when I communicated with Nigel
<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">But wouldn't a more realistic option be to mind your own business and contact no one? After all, it didn't concern you, did it?Originally posted by Alex:
Obviously I would have contacted Matt if it was an realistic option,
What gave you the right to interfere with Matt Pacini's ebay auction?
Answer the question.
It's silly to only point the finger at me Roger. Matt even went as far to update the info on the Shooting 8mm forum, but not Brantley's forum.
Does Pacini pick up his own dogs poop, probably not.
<font size="2" face="verdana, sans-serif">So what? You're trying desperately to make a connection where there is none, Alex. In fact, you've sort of lied your way into a corner here. Since you've made the admission that you were aware Matt's old post hadn't been updated, then you KNEW it was in conflict with the information in the ebay ad, which had more up to date information that the camera worked fine. So why send a link for it to the highest bidder EXCEPT for the sole purpose to stir up trouble for Matt? Either you believed Matt's ebay description that the camera worked fine or you didn't. Which is it?Originally posted by Alex:
Matt even went as far to update the info on the Shooting 8mm forum, but not Brantley's forum.
In either case, wouldn't a more realistic (and ethical) option be to mind your own business and contact no one? After all, it didn't concern you, did it? You aren't the ebay police. You didn HAVE to do anything.
What gave you the right to interfere with Matt Pacini's ebay auction?
Answer the question.
Let's just bump this up to the top.
Answer the question, Alex.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks